The Paradox of Mr. Nice Guy

Mrs. Enlightened knows exactly what she wants.

She wants a man who is kind but not weak, confident but not arrogant, emotionally available but not needy, ambitious but always present, masculine but safe, dominant but consensually invisible.

In short, she wants a man who behaves like a monk, feels like a therapist, earns like a CEO, looks like a rebel, and desires her exclusively—while never needing her, because need is unattractive.

Enter Mr. Nice Guy.

Mr. Nice Guy listened.
He adapted.
He communicated.
He respected boundaries so well he erased himself entirely.

And Mrs. Enlightened says:

“He’s perfect… I just don’t feel that way.”

Because desire, inconveniently, did not attend the workshop.

What she responds to is not what she requests.
What she requests is socially legible.
What she responds to is biologically embarrassing.

She wants the man who could leave, not the one who promised he wouldn’t.
She wants autonomy mistaken for mystery, strength mistaken for effortlessness, and confidence that never asks for reassurance—especially after she asked for reassurance.

Mr. Nice Guy is confused.
Mrs. Enlightened is confused.
Evolution is not.

The paradox:
The man women say they want is optimized for cooperation.
The man they desire is optimized for selection.

And modern dating insists—politely, earnestly, and repeatedly—that these should be the same man.

They are not.
And poor Mr. Nice Guy keeps taking notes.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Marriage: the silent empire of control.

A Carne que Questiona

The Great Delusion