Marriage: the silent empire of control.

Throughout history, marriage has been presented as a sacred union, a merging of souls, a natural expression of affection. But beneath that poetic veil lies an ancient social contract designed to regulate possession, inheritance, reproduction, and loyalty. What began as a means of controlling women’s bodies and lineage slowly evolved into a subtler dance — one where control became mutual, but never disappeared.

What we call “love” is often the most refined mask of domination. Every marriage begins with desire — the will to possess, to be chosen, to secure one’s reflection in another. But beneath that tenderness lies a deeper instinct: the will to control. Nietzsche would call it the will to power — the impulse that drives every human bond, disguised as devotion.

For centuries, men ruled women through law, property, and religion. Marriage was their fortress. But every structure of control breeds its mirror — and so women, denied outward authority, mastered inward power. They learned to rule not through decree but through emotion, conscience, and need. The modern home became a quiet battlefield: law on one side, love on the other.

Men once ruled with law, now women rule with feeling. The domestic sphere, once a place of confinement, became a domain of subtle governance. Through emotional intelligence, social awareness, and moral framing, women learned to influence what they were once forbidden to command. In many relationships, men may hold the illusion of freedom, while women hold the architecture of meaning — setting boundaries, dictating moral order, and controlling access to affection and validation.

In today’s world, the legal chains have broken, but the psychological ones remain — softer, invisible, and more absolute. The woman no longer submits to her husband’s command; the man now submits to her judgment. He lives within the frame she defines: emotional, moral, domestic. The wife governs not by force but by interpretation — she shapes meaning, defines what counts as care, what counts as failure.

In the modern world, many like to imagine marriage as an egalitarian partnership. Yet, if we look deeper, the same ancient forces remain, only disguised in emotional language. The old patriarchal control of men over women has, in many cases, inverted. Today, emotional and psychological dynamics often favor women — not because society granted them more rights, but because the terrain of control changed.

Marriage, then, is not a harmony of souls but a duel of powers in disguise. The partners are both sovereign and captive — each mastering through affection, each enslaving through tenderness. The modern couple calls this “love,” but love, when stripped of illusion, is the will to make another necessary.

To marry is to enter a game where freedom is the first sacrifice and control is the hidden prize. We do not love to be free — we love to be needed, to conquer subtly, to own without appearing to. And in this, marriage remains what it has always been: the most civilized form of captivity humanity has ever invented.

Marriage, then, is not about equality, but equilibrium — a balance of opposing forces, each seeking to master without being mastered. It is less a union of hearts than a treaty of control, constantly renegotiated between two people who must each yield enough to keep the other from revolting.

The question is not whether marriage liberates or enslaves, but who holds the subtler form of power — the one that hides itself behind love.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Carne que Questiona

Sobre a pele, um tratado de existir: teus dedos traçam mapas de um vazio primordial. Cada toque — um ato de rebeldia contra o nada, cada beijo — um problema sem solução na boca. Não somos deuses, mas animais que pensam, suando angústia no crepúsculo do quarto. Estes corpos, feitos de acaso e desejo, procuram sentido no breve tremor de um músculo. Abraço-te não por amor, mas por desespero, porque a solidão é um abismo muito largo para um só. E quando entras em mim, não é para preencher, mas para ampliar o vazio que nos define. Gozamos não de prazer, mas de esquecimento: trinta segundos de silêncio metafísico. Antes que a mente retorne, pesada, a perguntar por quê. Nesta cama, sob o peso do universo indiferente, inventamos significados com nossos húmidos corpos. Sabendo que amanhã seremos de novo dois estranhos, vestindo a mesma solidão essencial.
Read more

Echos in the void

 In the void's embrace, where stars burn out, Our love was a whisper, a fleeting shout. You a shadow in the cosmic play, Embraced the end, in his own stark way. No gods, no myths, in his final breath, She met the void, the eternal death. Life, a fleeting spark, a moment's blaze, In its brief fire, we spent our days. Chance brought us close, in the endless night, In time's cold expanse, a brief respite. Ten years, a blink in the universe's eye, Under indifferent stars, we lived our lie. Now she's gone, into nothingness' fold, Her absence a void, dark and cold. No reunion in some ethereal sphere, Just the silence of the cosmos, vast and clear. In the grand emptiness, where we drift apart, Our love but a dream, in the cosmic heart. In the end, alone, we each must roam, In the universe's void, forever home.
Read more